Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Murphy

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 22, 1937No. 31Published

1Opinion of the Court

Certiorari, 301 U. S. 677 (No. 909), to the Circuit Court of Kenton County, Kentucky.

2Per curiam

After hearing argument the Court is of the opinion that the motion of the respondent to dismiss the- writ of certiorari should be granted, and the writ is accordingly dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. McKnight v. James, 155 U. S. 685; Lambert v. Barrett, 157 U. S. 697, 699, 700; Weldington v. Sloan, 54 Ky. 147; Broadwell v. Commonwealth, 98 Ky. 15; Proffer v. Stewart, 259 Ky. 445.

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lambert v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. McKnight v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Broadwell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  4. Proffer v. Stewart, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Weddington v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1854