Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Babcock

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. Docket No. 66PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by Lincoln S. Rogers against Adelbert H. Babcock for rent. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action to recover a balance claimed to be due for the rental of a house and lot in the city of Detroit, and also for damages resulting to *95the premises during the term through the negligence of the tenant. In May, 1900, the premises were let by a written lease for the term ending May 1, 1901, with the privilege granted to the tenant of renewing the lease for the further period of one year. The premises were in fact occupied by the defendant up to January 27, 1902, when the defendant proceeded to pack and store his household goods, and went South with his family. Because of the house…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Henkel v. WelshMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lynder v. SS Kresge CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Craven v. SkobbaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Karpp v. RoyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Commercial Bank of Menominee v. WeidmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Walters v. Quality Biscuit Division of United-Biscuit Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API