Legal Opinion

Biever v. Davis

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County

Decided February 6, 1922No. 143Published

Rule for judgment for want of sufficient affidavit of defence. C. P. Berks Co., Aug. T., 1920, No. 143.

1Opinion of the Court

Endlich, P. J.,

This is a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defence. In its disposition, of course, every material averment of fact in the affidavit is to be taken as verity. On the other hand, every material allegation of the statement which is not denied (and a mere *193disavowal of knowledge concerning an allegation of fact, with a demand for its proof, is not a denial of the allegation: Eberbach v. Steamship Co., 74 Pa. Superior Ct. 79, and see Buehler v. Fashion Plate Co., 269 Pa. 428) is to be treated as admitted, and whatever fact essential to the defence proposed is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Memmert v. McKeenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Lord v. Ocean BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. Kaufman & Co. v. Cooper Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  5. Berger v. WeinsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API