Legal Opinion

Ozanne v. Illinois Cent. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky

Decided March 16, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

At the conclusion of all the testimony the defendant moved the court to direct a verdict in its favor. The motion was fully argued yesterday afternoon, and I have given the questions raised as full and careful consideration as the time has permitted. If the only question were whether the lady who sues was distressingly and permanently injured, an answer in the affirmative could, very easily and very truthfully be made, but even though this be true, it does not follow that she is entitled to recover from the defendant. That result must depend upon other and further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carnegie Steel Co. v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Detroit Southern R. Co. v. LambertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re RubelDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1908
  2. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1917
  3. Delaney v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburgh Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. BirchettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API