Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Schilman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This case was decided, by Division A. Appealed from the Circuit Court for Marion County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

This is a bill for. partition and accounting filed by the complainants as heirs of J. H. M. Atkin*302son, who was one of the five children of Shadrick Atkinson, deceased, who in his life time, together with one Thomas M. Crocker, oAvned the land lying in Marion county, -sought to be partitioned—the suit is brought against the other heirs of Shadrick Atkinson and the Crocker heirs, the respective interests being set forth, and also against certain phosphate miners, who have been operating under leases, as to whom discovery only is sought of the amount and value of the phosphate so mined.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camp Phosphate Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  2. Schroeder v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Young v. Miami Beach Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Carlton v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  3. Saucer v. EfstathionSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API