Legal Opinion

Bolduc v. Glendale Federal Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 26, 1994No. 93-0421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PARIENTE, Judge.

In this eminent domain proceeding, the owner and mortgage holder appeal a final judgment of apportionment awarding lessees, Armond’s Upholstery (Armond’s) and PSI Printing (PSI), a portion of the owner’s settlement with the condemning authority, the State of Florida Department of Transportation (DOT), for the “bonus value” of their leasehold interests in the condemned property. We find that the apportionment award to the lessees constituted an impermissible double recovery and accordingly reverse.

Upon the taking of the property in this case, PSI entered into a settlement and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  2. Mulkey v. DIV. OF ADMIN. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. National Advertising Co. v. STATE, DOTDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. AAA Million Auto Parts, Inc. v. AffronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hartleb v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API