Legal Opinion

State v. Messier

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 17, 1977No. 1 CA-CR 2096 to 1 CA-CR 2098PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

We are being asked to consider whether the trial court erred when it denied a motion for an examination of appellant’s mental condition prior to accepting his guilty plea. An additional issue has been raised by the State as to whether a defendant may appeal a ruling on competency after he has entered a guilty plea.

The material facts behind the presentation of these issues are as follows. While on probation for forgery (CR-78885) and burglary (CR-86762) appellant was arrested and charged with three counts of theft of a motor vehicle (CR-91425). He eventually plead guilty to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. James Edward Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Isaac J. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  5. Gene A. Krupnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SteelmanArizona Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. BorbonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Bishop v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA CTY.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Trawick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API