Legal Opinion
Tellez v. Madrigal
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided November 9, 2017No. EP–15–CV–304–KCPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KATHLEEN CARDONE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On this day, the Court considered Defendant Jorge Carlos Vergara Madrigal's Motion to Compel Arbitration, ECF No. 107, and Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Determinations of Arbitrability, ECF No. 118. For the reasons set forth herein, the Motion to Compel Arbitration is DENIED . Additionally, the Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED as moot.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background
This case arises from a dispute that concerns the business interests of former spouses. The factual background is extensive and has been set out in the Court's Order from…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Marie v. Allied Home Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Guidry v. United States Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- BG Group, PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brock Services, LLC v. RogillioDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Fidelity Auto Group, LLC, D/B/A Baytown Nissan v. Gretchen Hargroder, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2024
- Majestic Synthetic Oil, LLC. v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2025
- Nastassja McCullough v. MHMR of Tarrant CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2026
- Qazi v. Stage Stores, Inc. d/b/a Peebles, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.