Legal Opinion
ARREOLA-ALBARRAN v. ORTIZ
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 19, 2019No. 1:17-cv-04500Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CANDIDO ARREOLA-ALBARRAN, Civil Action Petitioner, No. 17-4500 (RBK) v. OPINION DAVID ORTIZ, Respondent. ROBERT B. KUGLER, U.S.D.J. Petitioner, Candido Arreola-Albarran, is a federal prisoner currently incarcerated at FCI Fort Dix, in Fort Dix, New Jersey. He is proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Respondent filed an Answer opposing relief (ECF No. 8), and Petitioner did not file a reply. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the Petition. I. BACKGROUND This…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Woodall v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.