TECHWORKS, LLC v. Wille
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1DissentBrennan, J.
¶ 31. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from that portion of the Majority's opinion granting summary judgment to Techworks on the issue of the validity of the non-compete agreement and on the Majority's remand for trial on the issue of whether David Wille violated the non-compete agreement. I conclude that Techworks has not met its burden of showing that the two-year, look-back provision applicable to former customers, who ceased doing business with Techworks, is reasonable as to time or that it is *518necessary to its business. And, because I conclude these provisions are indivisible from the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gary Van Zeeland Talent, Inc. v. SandasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- NBZ, INC. v. PilarskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
- Streiff v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. Hunzinger Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
- Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin, ACA v. WysockiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.