Legal Opinion · Dissent

TECHWORKS, LLC v. Wille

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 31, 2009No. 2008AP1702Published

1DissentBrennan, J.

¶ 31. (dissenting). I respectfully dissent from that portion of the Majority's opinion granting summary judgment to Techworks on the issue of the validity of the non-compete agreement and on the Majority's remand for trial on the issue of whether David Wille violated the non-compete agreement. I conclude that Techworks has not met its burden of showing that the two-year, look-back provision applicable to former customers, who ceased doing business with Techworks, is reasonable as to time or that it is *518necessary to its business. And, because I conclude these provisions are indivisible from the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gary Van Zeeland Talent, Inc. v. SandasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. NBZ, INC. v. PilarskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. Streiff v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Transportation Insurance Co. v. Hunzinger Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. Farm Credit Services of North Central Wisconsin, ACA v. WysockiWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API