Legal Opinion

State v. Edgerton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7429SC988PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

Defendants assign as error the failure of the court to allow their motions for nonsuit. We find no merit in this assignment and hold that the evidence was sufficient to survive the motions.

By assignments of error 5 and 6, defendants contend the court erred in its instructions to the jury with respect to the elements of the offense set forth in the warrants. Defendants contend that in addition to charging the jury that the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt (1) that Mrs. Cable was in possession of the property at the time in question, (2) that defendants entered upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. State v. Wells.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. S. v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. State v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API