State v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.
The State of Wisconsin appeals for the second time from James Andrews' judgment of conviction for delivery of a controlled substance and from the resulting order of probation. On remand, the trial court held that the University of Wisconsin — Oshkosh does not qualify as a school under sec. 161.49, Stats., an argument Andrews first presented following the remand, and therefore that the sec. 161.49 school area penalty enhancer relied upon by the state was not applicable. The trial court agreed and thus reinstated its original order of six years probation, but on different grounds than the first…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. HermannCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- State v. DietzenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996