Legal Opinion

State v. Treis

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Count 1: The state contends that defendant permitted Lawrence Doligalski and Myra Czajkowski to commit perjury when he knew, or ought to have known, that they were doing so, and by so doing assisted them in obstructing justice. We shall not repeat the facts involved in this count. They are fully set forth in the preceding statement. Neither in its brief nor on the oral argument did the state contend that defendant knew Doligalski and Myra Czajkowski committed perjury or false swearing in any of the affidavits made by them or on their adverse-party examinations. But the state argues that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ziegler v. Hustisford Farmers' Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Steinberg v. SaltzmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. StumpfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. PrestonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API