Pearman v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
The merchandise the subject of this appeal consists of knitted scarfs and shawls made of hair of the alpaca; it was assessed for duty by the collector at 60 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 358 of the tariff act of 1913, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:
Par. 358. Laces, lace window curtains not specially provided for in this section, coach, carriage, and automobile laces, and all lace articles of whatever yarns, threads, or filaments composed; handkerchiefs, napkins, wearing apparel, and all other articles or fabrics made wholly or in part of lace or of imitation lace of any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Protests 959088-G of G. E. Meissner Co.United States Customs Court · 1939
- United States v. Quong Sang ChongCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931