Legal Opinion · Dissent

Katherine Simmons v. City Stores Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1969No. 25542Published

1DissentBell, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. As I perceive the holding of the majority, it is that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur should have carried plaintiff-appellant to the jury. I cannot agree. The case of Alabama Power Co. v. Berry, 254 Ala. 228, 48 So.2d 231 (1950), cited by the majority on the Alabama res ipsa loquitur standard is inapposite. One of the essential elements is that “the injury is such as, in the ordinary course of things, does not occur if the one having such control- uses proper care.” Alabama Power, supra, 48 So.2d at 238. See also Prosser, Torts, 218. This element was present in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  2. Finch v. WillmottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Hutsell v. EdensNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API