Ex Parte City of Ashland
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Morris, Commissioner
Reversing.
Ashland, a city of the second class operating under the commission form of government, filed an ex parte petition in the Boyd circuit court seeking to have declared valid Ordinance No. 37, as amended by Ordinance No. 52, adopted by the city commissioners in 1934. The city was the sole party to the action. On a hearing in the lower court, the ordinance as amended was declared valid, and the matter comes up on appeal by the city.
The original ordinance provided substantially that all persons upon whom jail sentences had been inflicted in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex parte City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- City of Newport v. GlazierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Shoemaker v. HodgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
- Ex parte City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Home Construction Co. v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carrico v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
- State v. VegaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Ex Parte Marshall Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Skelton v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984