Franklin v. Neill & Clark
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Per Cukiam.
Appellees Neill & Clark move this court to dismiss the appeal because appellant did not prosecute his appeal within the time prescribed by the new statute, chapter 153, Laws of 1926, approved on March 8, 1926, which amended section 2476, Hemingway’s Code, and changed the time from one year to six months in which appeals to this court must be prosecuted, and in the case before us the judgment was obtained in September, 1925, and the appeal bond was filed in July, 1926, which was more than six months after rendition of the judgment, and therefore, if the amended statute limiting the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- McClendon v. Boyd Construction Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- Harrington v. Yazoo M.V.R. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Wilkinson v. WilsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929