Agger v. Frank Donatelli & Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
According to the complaint, this action of assumpsit was upon a contract, partly oral and partly written. The jury found for the plaintiff and defendant appealed.
The testimony shows that the defendant contended there was no contract but merely proposals and counter-proposals.
The evidence would sustain jury findings that sometime in June, 1947, negotiations began between the parties for the plaintiff to manufacture an iron railing, to be erected on a job which the defendant was performing for the State Highway Department. Plaintiff was shown plans and specifications which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Kostello v. KostelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Schwoerer v. PHILADELPHIASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Discovich v. Chestnut Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rea v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Exner v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961