Legal Opinion

Agger v. Frank Donatelli & Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1952No. Appeal, No. 70PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Arnold, J.,

According to the complaint, this action of assumpsit was upon a contract, partly oral and partly written. The jury found for the plaintiff and defendant appealed.

The testimony shows that the defendant contended there was no contract but merely proposals and counter-proposals.

The evidence would sustain jury findings that sometime in June, 1947, negotiations began between the parties for the plaintiff to manufacture an iron railing, to be erected on a job which the defendant was performing for the State Highway Department. Plaintiff was shown plans and specifications which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Kostello v. KostelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Schwoerer v. PHILADELPHIASuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Discovich v. Chestnut Ridge Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rea v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Exner v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API