Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Ruple

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1936No. 25486PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The right of private property is guaranteed and protected by the fundamental law of the state and nation. The state and federal Constitutions provide that no person shall be deprived of his property without due process or due course of law. The Ohio Constitution further provides that private property shall ever be held inviolate but subservient to the public welfare, and classes among the inalienable rights of man those of acquiring, possessing and protecting property.

Private property is subject to three rights of government: (1) The right of eminent domain, (2) the right of police power, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Loan Assn. v. TopekaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Green v. FrazierSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Beach v. BradstreetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bowman v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  2. Park-N-Shop, Inc. v. SparkmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. City of Toledo v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Heimerl v. Ozaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Hayden v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API