Ramco Industries v. Preuss (In Re Preuss)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUGHES, Bankruptcy Judge.
Rameo Industries appeals from an order denying its application for relief from the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) which arose when debtors filed their Chapter 7 cases. There being no equity in the property subject to appellant’s lien, we reverse. 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(2)(A).
I
Ervin and Dorothy Preuss entered into a land sales contract with their son Dale on January 2, 1977. The property was valued at $38,000. Dale agreed to pay $8000 down and $208 each month for 30 years. Title was to pass oil completion of payments after 30 years or, at the buyer’s option,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- GMAC v. Stewart (In Re Stewart)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- National Institutes of Health Federal Credit Union v. Moore (In Re Moore)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nevada National Bank v. Casgul of Nevada (In Re Casgul of Nevada)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Central Mortgage Co. v. Galbraith (In Re Galbraith)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Ramco Industries v. Moore (In re Moore)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Douglas Leroy BlunkallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2020