People v. Salazar
California Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CUÉLLAR, J.,
Concurring.—A core premise of our legal system, grounded in our basic charters of governance, is that society distinguishes between juveniles and adults who commit crimes. (E.g., Miller v. Alabama (2012) 567 U.S. 460, 471 [183 L.Ed.2d 407, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2464] (Miller) [‘‘children are constitutionally different from adults for purposes of sentencing”]; see Manduley v. Superior Court (2002) 27 Cal.4th 537, 548 [117 Cal.Rptr.2d 168, 41 P.3d 3] [discussing differential treatment of juveniles and adults].) We draw such a distinction not only in the general domain of criminal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Romano v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. W.B.California Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. BivertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.