Crocker v. Johnston
New Mexico Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceBickley, Chief Justice
I concur in the result because I think the trial court should have submitted the issue of contributory negligence. I concur with Mr. Justice ZINN in his observations concerning Pettes v. Jones, supra. Instead of disturbing Pettes v. Jones, supra, the dictum contained in Thayer v. Denver & R. G. R. Co., 21 N. M. 330, 154 P. 691, and in Bell v. Carter Tobacco Co., 41 N. M. 513, 71 P. 2d 683, 685, to the effect that “The plea of contributory negligence is a plea in confession and avoidance, which admits negligence on the part of the defendant, but seeks to avoid liability therefor by alleging…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
- Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
- Sheets v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.