Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Crocker v. Johnston

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1939No. 4422Published

1ConcurrenceBickley, Chief Justice

I concur in the result because I think the trial court should have submitted the issue of contributory negligence. I concur with Mr. Justice ZINN in his observations concerning Pettes v. Jones, supra. Instead of disturbing Pettes v. Jones, supra, the dictum contained in Thayer v. Denver & R. G. R. Co., 21 N. M. 330, 154 P. 691, and in Bell v. Carter Tobacco Co., 41 N. M. 513, 71 P. 2d 683, 685, to the effect that “The plea of contributory negligence is a plea in confession and avoidance, which admits negligence on the part of the defendant, but seeks to avoid liability therefor by alleging…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Thayer v. Denver & Rio Grande R. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Hoffman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Sheets v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API