Legal Opinion
Krause v. TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORP.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 3, 2011No. SC09-881PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLabarga, J.
In the case before us, Andrew Krause and David Bautsch (“Petitioners”) seek review of the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal in Krause v. Textron Financial Corp., 10 So.3d 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009), on the ground that it expressly and directly conflicts with the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Scarfo v. Ginsberg, 817 So.2d 919 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
The issue presented for our determination is whether the federal supplemental jurisdiction statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d) (2006), tolls a state statute of limitations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Borden v. East-European Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Knowles v. Beverly Enterprises-FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Catherine Puetz Md v. Spectrum Health HospitalsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Foley v. AzamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. v. Charles ex rel. CharlesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Kathy Mahan, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kevin Mahan v. Officer Richard C. Samples, III and City of Jacksonville, FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Krause v. TEXTRON FINANCIAL CORP.Supreme Court of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.