Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Miller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1939No. 6633Published

1Concurrence

BUDGE, J.,

Concurring Specially. — Appellant was charged with and tried and convicted of the crime of driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying motion for new trial.

It appears necessary to consider but two assignments of error, the action of the trial court with respect thereto appearing to be error of a prejudicial nature requiring a reversal of the judgment.

Specification of error No. 3 is to the effect that the court erred in denying appellant’s counsel the right to examine jurors as to their…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. AnselmoUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Harrison v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  3. State v. PopaMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. ReyesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  5. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API