Huguet v. Hallet
New York Supreme Court
Soon after this suit was commenced, the attorneys for both parties entered into an agreement, in the nature of a rule to stay proceedings on the hail bond, on the usual terms. The defendant in the original suit accordingly filed special bail, and gave regular notice, but had not paid the costs of this suit, as by the terms of the agreement he was bound to do.
Read the full summary
Soon after this suit was commenced, the attorneys for both parties entered into an agreement, in the nature of a rule to stay proceedings on the hail bond, on the usual terms. The defendant in the original suit accordingly filed special bail, and gave regular notice, but had not paid the costs of this suit, as by the terms of the agreement he was bound to do. The plaintiff, on special bail being entered, went on in the original suit, and in July, 1802, obtained final judgment, on which execution was issued, and satisfied. The plaintiff afterwards proceeded in this suit, en tered a default, in…
1Per curiam
This is a motion to set a side proceedings on the bail bond on the facts stated by the affidavit. The original suit was commenced in January, 1802, and the writ returnable in April. Afterwards, in May, the action on the bail bond was brought. Shortly after, the plaintiff’s attorney received notice of bail in the original action, and then delivered a declaration. He went on to judgment, and issued his execution, which was fully paid. After this he proceeded on the bail bond to recover costs. The plaintiff’s attorney states that he called on the attorney of the defendant, and requested him to…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Bird v. FakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1843