Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Ronnie Bradford Insurance Agency

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1990No. 89-675Published

1DissentKnoll, Judge

I agree with the majority that at the time the Bradford Agency prepared this insurance application, Louisiana law did not re*826quire the insured to select UM coverage on a separate form. See LSA-R.S. 22:1406(D)(l)(a) set forth in the majority-opinion. In the case sub judice, the insurance application under the designated “Uninsured Motorists Insurance” has limits of $25,000 per accident handwritten into the available space. The application also contains the signature of the agent, Ronnie Bradford, verifying that the insurance application was properly completed, and the purported signature of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ardoin v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Chiasson v. WhitneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Naulty v. Oupac, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Charpentier v. St. Martin Parish School Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Batiste v. Security Ins. GroupLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API