Legal Opinion

Marks Bros. v. Goossen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.

The contract in writing between defendant L. A. Goossen and Lanham-McTighe Company speaks for itself, as it is not ambiguous. It is to be considered as a whole in the light of the surrounding circumstances.

It will be seen that the contract provided that Lanham-McTighe Company were to erect the building at a cost to defendant not exceeding $8,000; anything in excess of that sum was to be borne by Lanham-McTighe Company, and defendant was to have the benefit of any less amount. Lan-ham-McTighe Company were to be paid eleven per cent, of the cost price, subject to such limitation to cover…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmer v. St. Croix Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. W. H. Pipkorn Co. v. TratnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KeyesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Staton v. Reynolds Metals Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API