Legal Opinion

Wright v. Scott

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 1995No. 94-3823PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Ronald L. Wright appeals a final summary judgment adding him, individually, to a final judgment obtained by appellee, Marcus Bernard Scott, several years earlier. However, Scott’s motion to correct the final judgment, which was made pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), was filed more than two years after entry of the initial final judgment, and nearly 18 months after entry of the last amended final judgment. Therefore, the trial court was without jurisdiction to amend the final judgment by adding Wright, because more than one year had passed since entry of the last amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanford v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Kippy Corporation v. ColburnSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. Love v. HannahSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. St. Cloud Utilities v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Hadley v. HadleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank One, NA v. BatronieDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Tannenbaum v. SheaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Goswick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. State v. VesquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Romero v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API