Street v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Talladega. Tried before Hon. L. F. Box. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion taken in connection with the previous report of the case in 67 Ala. (Street v. Nelson, p. 504).
1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.
This case has been once before in this court. Street v. Nelson, 67 Ala. 504. In that trial, as in this, the circuit court had refused to require Nelson & Kelly to produce the written contract with Kobbs Bros., under which the timber had been felled, and converted into coal. We reversed the judgment of the Circuit Court on account of that ruling. We said: “That [contract] defines and determines the relative rights of the parties as between themselves, and was a main issue, if not the main issue in the cause. The Circuit Court erred in not requiring the production of that contract in evidence,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- Curtis v. GroatNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Betts v. LeeNew York Supreme Court · 1810
- Wright v. GuierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
- Beatty v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Birmingham Mineral Railroad v. Tennessee Coal, Iron RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Aldrich Mining Co. v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Williams v. LyonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Howard v. CoreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Brooks v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.