Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 2019No. Appeal 3-16-0631UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carter

*643 ¶ 1 Defendant, Danyel B.J. Smith, appeals his convictions for predatory criminal sexual assault of a child and aggravated kidnapping. Defendant argues the admission of a recording of the victim's interview at a child advocacy center (CAC) violated his right to confrontation. Specifically, defendant argues that the victim was unavailable for cross-examination because she testified that she did not remember the events constituting the offense of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child. Defendant also argues that his mandatory sentence of life imprisonment was unconstitutional as applied…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Atkins v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 2023
  2. People v. RiggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API