Legal Opinion

Doughty v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County

Decided April 6, 1937No. 546Published

1Opinion of the Court

Bonniwell, J.,

This is a rule for leave to amend the statement of claim in an action brought by a beneficiary under a group life insurance policy. Plaintiff first sought a recovery of death benefits, but now seeks disability benefits.

*259The ground on which plaintiff requests leave to amend is that the policy provides that in the event the insured become totally and permanently disabled, prior to his sixtieth birthday, as the result of bodily injury or disease, so as to be prevented permanently from engaging in any occupation and performing any work for wage or profit, the company would, three…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prudential Ins. Co. v. Fidelity, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API