Legal Opinion

Ederer v. Ederer

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 3, 2004No. 2020310PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

Having read and considered the opinion of our Supreme Court inEx parte Ederer, 900 So.2d 424 (Ala. 2004), we make the following return to remand as instructed in that opinion.

Our standard of review when reviewing an appeal from a judgment granting or denying a requested modification of alimony is well settled.

"An obligation to pay alimony may be modified only upon a showing of a material change in circumstances that has occurred since the trial court's previous judgment, and the burden is on the party seeking a modification to make this showing. Thus,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BryowskySupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Ex Parte EdererSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Santiago v. SantiagoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  2. Goldman v. GoldmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  3. Blount v. BlountCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API