Legal Opinion
Hamidullah Makhmoor v. Mission Essential Personnel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2019No. 18-70723Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS OCT 28 2019 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT HAMIDULLAH MAKHMOOR, No. 18-70723 Petitioner, BRB No. 17-0339 v. MEMORANDUM* MISSION ESSENTIAL PERSONNEL; et al., Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board Submitted October 23, 2019** San Francisco, California Before: WALLACE and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and ENGLAND,*** District Judge. Hamidullah Makhmoor seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s (Board) order affirming the denial of total disability benefits under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mary M. MAGALLANES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Louis L. YOUNG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lockheed Shipbuilding v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Walker v. Rothschild International Stevedoring Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Richard Duhagon v. Metropolitan Stevedore CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.