Legal Opinion

William A. Sweeney v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 21, 1965No. 14901_1PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILEY, Circuit Judge.

The United States Attorney has confessed error in this § 2255 1 proceeding by reason of the district court’s denial of petitioner’s request for appointment of counsel. We reverse the judgment denying relief and remand for further proceedings.

On April 18, 1963, upon advice of court-appointed counsel, petitioner, a first offender, pleaded guilty to, and waived indictment for, a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. The district court imposed the maximum sentence of five years but suspended the sentence and placed petitioner upon probation for five years. On October…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. John Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  3. Joseph H. Milani v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dewitt Easter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Bernard E. Laclair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  3. State v. OylerIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Murphy v. RaoulDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. United States ex rel. Sole v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API