Hallsmith v. City of Montpelier
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Robinson, J.
This appeal calls upon us to determine whether a post-termination judicial remedy, in the form of a breach-of-contract action or a Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 75 petition, is sufficient to satisfy the due-process rights of an employee whose employment is protected by a “for cause” requirement and who is terminated by a municipal employer following pre-termination proceedings that do not by themselves satisfy due process. Appellee Gwendolyn Hallsmith petitioned for Rule 75 relief, arguing that the City of Montpelier failed to provide her sufficient due-process protections…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paul Flint v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- Athens School District v. Vermont State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In Re Appeal of M.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- In re Grievance of Patrick RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- Hallsmith v. City of Montpelier, Fraser and BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.