Legal Opinion

Hallsmith v. City of Montpelier

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 19, 2015No. 14-346PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

Robinson, J.

This appeal calls upon us to determine whether a post-termination judicial remedy, in the form of a breach-of-contract action or a Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 75 petition, is sufficient to satisfy the due-process rights of an employee whose employment is protected by a “for cause” requirement and who is terminated by a municipal employer following pre-termination proceedings that do not by themselves satisfy due process. Appellee Gwendolyn Hallsmith petitioned for Rule 75 relief, arguing that the City of Montpelier failed to provide her sufficient due-process protections…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Paul Flint v. Department of LaborSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. Athens School District v. Vermont State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  3. In Re Appeal of M.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2025
  4. In re Grievance of Patrick RyanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. Hallsmith v. City of Montpelier, Fraser and BakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API