Legal Opinion
Goldup v. The City of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 12, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00602Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARRETT MICHAEL GOLDUP, Case No.: 24-cv-602-RSH-AHG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, [ECF No. 21] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is a motion to dismiss by defendant City of San Diego (the 19 “City” or “Defendant”), directed to the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) of plaintiff 20 Garrett Michael Goldup. ECF No. 21. As set forth below, the motion is granted. 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 A. This Lawsuit 23 On March 28, 2024, Plaintiff, proceeding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Charles H. CAHILL; Aniko Der Cahill, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.