Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luce Co. v. Hoefler

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 22, 1983Published

1Dissent

DUFRESNE, Active Retired Justice,

with whom VIOLETTE, Justice, joins, dissenting.

It is undisputed that the two promissory notes which are the subject of this action were executed, the first on September 9, 1974, by the defendant, Herbert G. Hoefler, and the second on April 30, 1976, by both the defendant husband and his wife, Elizabeth S. Hoefler, and delivered to the Bank (The First National Bank of Farming-ton/Firstbank, N.A. — both being the same banking institution) for the repayment of loans. The Luce Company, a family partnership, interested in seeing that the Hoe-flers continued the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. RossiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  2. Qualey v. FultonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Reeves v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  4. Motley v. Manufacturers' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1849
  5. Bohanan v. PopeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1856

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API