Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Wolfle

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 27, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William J. Regan, S.

The contestant herein has asked for a preliminary examination of the subscribing witnesses under *809section 141 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The proponent, by its attorney in open court, advised the ‘Surrogate that one of the witnesses sought to be examined is recalcitrant and has refused his several requests to appear.

The proponent’s position is that if, as it appears here, it becomes necessary to subpoena such witness and to pay witness’ fees, etc., it is the duty of the contestant seeking the examination to bear those burdens. The contestant argues otherwise, claiming…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FelensteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of EliasNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of WestoverNew York Surrogate's Court · 1989
  2. In re MoccioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API