Legal Opinion

Listemann v. Philips Components

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for age discrimination pursuant to Executive Law § 296, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Nolan, J.), dated January 14, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In order to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination under Executive Law § 296, a plaintiff must plead and prove that (1) he or she is a member of a protected class, (2) he or she was actively or constructively discharged, (3) he or she was qualified to hold the position…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ferrante v. American Lung Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Mayer v. Manton Cork Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Dolgon v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DelPapa v. Queensborough Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Saia v. Suffolk County Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API