Legal Opinion

Shuster v. Davis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUCK, j:

As above noted, the particular property in dispute is incapable of cultivation and incapabale of enclosure by boundary fences. The defendant claims that her cattle have for years crossed the creek and occupied the strip lying beyond the *343stream and says that she and her predecessors in title have sold gravel off the strip. Plaintiff shows that he has planted willows along the stream and upon the disputed tract and never understood that any claim was asserted thereto by the defendant until within the last two or three years. In order for the defendant to make her case, standing as she…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Montieth v. Twin Falls United Methodist Church, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Fulton v. RappOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Galbraith v. J.J. Detweiler Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Jones v. VandervortOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API