Legal Opinion

New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 2, 1953No. 4184PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.

The issue dealing with separations arises because subscribers use most of the plant of the company in New Hampshire in common for local or exchange calls, intrastate toll calls and interstate toll calls. The company’s books of accounts, however, have to be kept according to a “Uniform System of Accounts” prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission which does not provide for the showing of intrastate and interstate results separately. The commission having jurisdiction over intrastate operations only, the company’s investment, expenses and revenues have to be apportioned between…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. State Corporation Com'n v. Mountain States Tel. & Tel. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re the Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API