Legal Opinion

Herning v. Wigger

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1965No. 519PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

This suit was instituted by Walter Wig-ger as plaintiff to enforce certain contrae-' tual obligations which he alleged the defendants Herning and Horner owed to him. Upon issue joined and trial had to the court, findings of fact and judgment were rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the, defendants have appealed, contending, among, other things, that there was a failure of ¡consideration from the plaintiff and that,the parties mutually rescinded the contract which contained the obligations sued upon.

It appears from the trial court’s findings that in August of 1957 the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Limited, of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  2. Ogden v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Briggs v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. StanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jackson v. WhiteAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stephenson v. Ketchikan Spruce Mills, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Associated Engineers & Contractors, Inc. v. H & W Construction Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API