Legal Opinion

Town of North Hempstead v. Leeds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

It is concluded that the defendant has not title to the locus in quo, through herself or predecessors, by allotment, by grant, or by adverse possession, but that she has a prescriptive right to use the dam and its appliances for the purposes of the mill, to the degree that it has been operated, and to flood the locus in quo and draw the water therefrom for such purpose. The possession of the plaintiff is subject to that right, and the verdict should have so provided. A new trial is granted, with costs, except in this court, to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall within twenty days…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lawyers Title & Trust Co. v. HewlettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API