Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bishop v. Baldwin Acoustical & Drywall

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 7, 1997No. 96-1813Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partErvin, Judge

In this workers’ compensation appeal, James L. Bishop, claimant, challenges the entry of an order which denied him certain requested relief. He asserts that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred (1) by not admitting the testimony of claimant’s primary treating physician regarding claimant’s anatomic permanent impairment rating, (2) by not admitting the testimony of claimant’s treating psychologist in regard to claimant’s permanent psychological impairment rating and the causal relation between his brain injury and industrial accident, and (3) by finding that claimant did not present…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deinema v. Pierpoint CondominiumsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Haas v. SeekellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Racz v. Chennault, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Cabrera v. Universal Trusses, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API