Legal Opinion
State v. Harwood
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 22, 1986No. 85-1112PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
488 So.2d 901 (1986)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Margaret Elaine HARWOOD and Steward Carl Stamper, Appellees.
No. 85-1112.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 22, 1986.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert H. Bailey, Jr. of Bailey & Trumbo, P.A., New Smyrna Beach, for appellees.
ORFINGER, Judge.
We affirm the order of the trial court suppressing the evidence in this case on the ground that the disputed testimony supports the trial court's finding that there were no articulable facts and rational…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. CreightonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- State v. HuntDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Porter v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. ConeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SheltonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- State v. NelsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Moakley v. SmallwoodDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Alan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Bates v. StateCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.