Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Reorganized Catlin Canal Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 4, 1935No. 13,268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

This is a suit, begun December 17,1931, to quiet title to water rights based on a supplemental statutory adjudication proceeding entered November 4,1897, in favor of the Las Animas Consolidated Canal Company, a Coloradq corporation, one of the defendants, under and through which plaintiffs claim by virtue of stock interest. The other defendants, also Colorado corporations, were the [Reorganized Catlin Canal Company and the Fort Lyon Canal Company. The Fort Lyon company answered, pleading a contract in modification of the decree of November 4, 1897, entered into by the three companies December…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Comstock v. Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  2. Forker v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Reorganized Catlin Consolidated Canal Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Las Animas Consolidated Canal Co. v. HinderliderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API