Rothwell v. Kremer Hoffman

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is by a wage claimant to a preference for two weeks ’ wages: Act of May 12, 1891, P. L. 54. A correct understanding of the case cannot be obtained from the record as printed by appellant. In his petition for preference, claimant avers “that the above named defendants employed and hired” him, etc., but as printed in the record, the caption to the case is omitted so that it doe's not appear to whom the words “the above named defendants” apply. The confusion is continued throughout the petition by other references “to the defendants.” At the conclusion of the…