Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Smoulter

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1889No. 454PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY. No. 454 January Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 119 May Term 1889, C. P. On March 4, 1889, William Zirnhelt presented his petition to the court below, showing that on February 23, 1889, at a Court of Quarter Sessions holden, etc., said court had granted to him a license to sell vinous, spirituous, malt or brewed liquors, at retail, in the Fifth ward of the city of Wilkes-Barre ; that on March 4, 1889, being within…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LUZERNE COUNTY. No. 454 January Term 1889, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 119 May Term 1889, C. P. On March 4, 1889, William Zirnhelt presented his petition to the court below, showing that on February 23, 1889, at a Court of Quarter Sessions holden, etc., said court had granted to him a license to sell vinous, spirituous, malt or brewed liquors, at retail, in the Fifth ward of the city of Wilkes-Barre ; that on March 4, 1889, being within 15 days after said license was granted, the petitioner tendered and offered to pay to John Smoulter, Jr., treasurer of…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam :

This ease is affirmed upon the opiidon of the learned president of the court below.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Liem v. RobinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Reading City v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API