Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
SHERAN, Chief Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the State of Minnesota may, consistent with both the federal and state constitutions, impose a use tax on consumption of ink and paper which, due to an exemption in the law, is paid by some newspapers and publications but not by all. The challenged statute in force at the times relevant here, Minn.Stat. § 297A.14 (1980), provided that “the cost of paper and ink products exceeding $100,000 in any calendar year, used or consumed in producing a publication defined in section 297A.25, subdivision 1, clause (i)” was subject to the general use…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Police Dept. of Chicago v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983