Legal Opinion

Coudon v. Whitaker

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 15, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The appeal in this case is from a. decree of the Court below overruling a demurrer to an amended bill of complaint after this Court, on a former appeal, affirmed the decree of the lower Court adjudging the original bill bad for multifariousness and granting the plaintiffs leave to amend.

In 130 Md. 234, Judge Pattison set out at length the facts alleged in the original bill, and also the several prayers for relief, and after stating that the decree of the lower Court should be affirmed on the ground mentioned he said: “We think, however, it well to say that by the allegations of the bill it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanson v. WorthingtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1858
  2. Coudon v. UpdegrafCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Preston v. HorwitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Love v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Morton v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API